|
Measurements of
success in diabetic foot care
Health care targets currently focus on reduction in the incidence
of amputation, while the majority of trials into new treatments
use healing. Although conceptually simple, both measures
require careful definition. Moreover, each contains an implicit
assumption: that their achievement is synonymous with good care, with
success. This is not always the case, and the endpoints for future
prospective research and audit must be chosen with precision. The first
principle to be embraced is that of population selection – since the
results of research and audit should usually be generalisable, and this
is not possible unless the population is carefully characterized in
terms of people (race, age, diabetes control, co-morbidities etc), limb
(ischaemia, neuropathy, deformity) and ulcer (duration, area, depth,
infection etc). The second issue relates to trial design: is the study
one to determine efficacy (“can it work ?”),
efficiency (“does it work ?”) or effectiveness
(“how well does it work ?). Chosen endpoints are also governed by the
type of intervention being studied: reduction of ulcer area might be an
appropriate measure of the efficacy of a wound care
product, or peripheral limb TcpO2 for a revascularisation
procedure. But studies of efficiency and
effectiveness should be more patient-centered and include
measures of well-being and satisfaction. Studies of antibiotics pose
special problems and yet they are still desperately needed to answer
many unanswered questions on choice, route, duration and role vis
à
vis surgery.
The difficulty with antibiotic trials relates to the fact that their
role is to eradicate infection (and not necessarily to heal ulcers, or
to save limbs) – and yet both infection and its eradication are very
difficult to define, either clinically or microbiologically. In
evaluating antibiotic regimens, the best approach may be to compare
costs, adverse events and patient-centred measures, while assuming
therapeutic equivalence.
Abstract for presentation at
De diabetische voet, Almelo, The Netherlands, January
2004
|